See which text prompted a question
Review highlighted sections instead of treating a whole submission as one unexplained score.
Academic integrity
Use the AI Content Detector to analyze a text submission and review passages that show patterns consistent with AI-generated content. A flag or confidence score is not a verdict. Examine the writing, consider false positives, and speak with the student before deciding what to do.
See the workspace before you sign in.

01 / THE DIFFERENCE
Practical tools that leave the decisions with you.
Review highlighted sections instead of treating a whole submission as one unexplained score.
Use specific passages as a starting point for asking about the student's process.
Consider false positives, especially in strong structured writing, before taking any action.
02 / IN PRACTICE
A closer look at how this fits into your day.
Explore the interactive app demoPaste or upload at least 100 characters; adding a student name is optional.
Choose Analyze and inspect the highlighted passages and confidence score.
Compare the result with assignment context and talk with the student; do not use the signal as proof by itself.
WHAT THIS COULD LOOK LIKE
Analyze the submitted text and inspect the exact passages flagged. Compare those sections with the student's drafts and assignment process, then invite the student to explain their work before making any decision.
GOOD TO KNOW
A little more detail before you dive in.
No. The detector provides a signal, not a definitive verdict. False positives exist, so discuss the work with the student before taking action.
The guide requires at least 100 characters of text for analysis.
YOUR WORKSPACE AWAITS
Explore WiseBoard on your own terms. Take a look around, or start your free trial.